- “You create your own reality.” Often meant to be empowering, for many it can feel hugely invalidating
- A constructive way to consider this concept is accepting that our expectations (which are informed by our prior experiences) often lead us to behave in ways that increase the likelihood that what we expect will be what we experience
- This can keep us locked in a cycle where what we expect (even if it’s not what we want) is likely to be what we experience again and again.
- Paul Wachtel’s “Cyclical Psychodynamic Model” explains how this can happen. In short, the past teaches us what to expect, we engage with the present based on those expectations, and how we engage effects others and influences the outcomes we experience.
- Broken down further: our expectations of how a situation will go influences how direct, open, vulnerable, friendly, trusting, and collaborative we are with any given person or at any given time.
- Others then responds to the presence (or absence) of those dynamics in a way that often leads to the outcome we expected.
- An example: imagine you expect someone to be dismissive of your perspective. You may approach them with tentativeness and apprehension trying not “ask too much” or irritate them. This may make it more difficult for you to be clear, direct, and open about the topic at hand.
- As a result of how you approached the topic, they may not understand you (leaving you feeling dismissed and unheard), or become irritated by their confusion / your vagueness (confirming your sense that they wouldn’t want to hear it).
- In this way, we can all inadvertently participate in shaping the outcomes of any given situation or dynamic based on the intersection of how our past experience informs our expectations and current behavior.
- More on this (including further examples and what to do about it) in today’s post and notes.
Chances are you’ve heard some version of the phrase “we create our own reality”. For many, this statement is confusing and invalidating, especially for those who have experienced trauma, systemic failures, or an inadequate developmental landscape. Paul Wachtel, a leading scholar in the world of psychotherapy, explains how we all participate in “creating our own reality”.
Per Wachtel, we learn from our relationships and experiences what we can expect from others and how others tend to perceive us. Based on what’s happened in our past, we come to expect certain behaviors, dynamics, and outcomes from people / situations. We carry those expectations with us into new relationships / situations and those expectations influence how we behave and interact. Our behavior and way of being with others then influences how others are with us, often in a way that continues to provide the experiences or dynamics we expected.
We can get locked in cycles where perhaps we don’t want an outcome, but expect it, and participate in our interactions in a way that makes it more likely the outcome will come to reality. The trouble is, many of us are often acting on expectations that are so hard wired we may not be aware just how powerful they are in influencing our behavior and relationships.
For us to constructively participate in “creating” our own reality in line with the life we want to lead we need to accept our prior experiences and expectations tend to lead us to behave in ways that increase the likelihood that what we expect will be what we experience. If we want to change our lives and start having different experiences we may need to work to override our “automatic” and “intuitive” ways of being.
If you find yourself experiencing the same dynamic or patterns with others, start with yourself. You may need to work to identify how you think others see you, what you expect of others, your sense of what others expect of you, and how all of that informs how you are in your interactions. Therapy, a mindfulness practice (which increases our ability for objectivity), reflective work, and feedback from trusted others can help us uncover these dynamics and work towards changing them.
Notes:
- The theory I’ve outlined is from Paul Wachtel’s book, “Relational Theory and the practice of Psychotherapy”, specifically chapter six’s discussion of the Cyclical Psychodynamic Model. Full Citation: Wachtel, P. L. (2008). Relational theory and the practice of psychotherapy. Guilford Press.
- Wachtel (pages 104-105) provides an example of two children to help us further understand how this dynamic can occur. He asks us to imagine one child who is friendly, outgoing, and open. This child will likely evoke friendliness in others and learn from those interactions that others are eager to interact with him. Another child is more shy, withdrawn, and hesitant to approach others. He will not be as likely to experience as much engagement as the first child, because he is not initiating as much or as openly friendly. The example of the children goes further, to explain how even the same situation can be participated in very differently, and in ways that continue to reinforce whatever the child’s natural tendencies are. He encourages us to consider how each child might interact with someone who is grumpy. For the child who is more prone to friendliness and openness that expectation that people are largely friendly and interested may help her engage with that person in a way that eventually does lead to a positive social interaction (like a smile). For the child who is more weary to interact he may be more likely to take someone’s grumpiness as a sign to back away, further reinforcing his beliefs about how interested others are in him.
- This perspective *does not* hold that we have complete control over outcomes in our life. This is more about the subtle ways in which our expectations inform our behavior, and that influences those around us. So no, this does not mean it’s your fault that some situations have turned out the way they have, but it may mean it’s worth considering how you participated, especially if you find yourself in a pattern that keeps repeating.
- A thought provoking quote from the book to help you reflect on how this happens, “In a host of ways, many of them not easy to identify or notice, each of us repeatedly induces others to behave in ways that are likely to maintain the pattern between us”. (page 105)
- Wachtel wrote portions of this chapter for therapists, to help them accept that we do a disservice to our clients if we ONLY help them identify and process through how the past effected them. He explains we also need to help our clients see how the past continues to inform the present, and how our behavior and the behavior of those around us are an interplay. Without addressing all aspects of this, and helping to build insight into both how and why the pattern developed and how it currently plays out we leave our clients struggles insufficiently addressed.
- If you are doing the work of changing cyclical patterns in your life, this means you are also changing how you are in relationships. It’s important to know that others have gotten used to your cyclical patterns too, and that they may need some time to catch up and adjust. See this post for further discussion.
- I further outline how we use our past to learn and make connections that effect our present day in this post.